NABU
  • Contacts
  • Press
  • Shop
  • DE | EN
  • About us
      • Safeguards
        Our commitment: avoiding, minimising and compensating environmental and social risks

        Key tool: The external Communication and Grievance Mechanism more →

      • Sustainable Development Goals
        Charting the way to a better future

        NABU and the 17 Sustainable Development Goals more →

      • About us
      • Who we are
      • Contacts
      • Transparency
      • Cooperations
      • Data Protection
      • Explore our projects
      • AfriEvolve
      • Hutan Harapan
      • LIFE Multi Peat
      • Coffee-novation
      • Further projects
  • Topics
      • Climate Smart Agriculture
        Capacity development for green NGOs in Africa

        Capacity development for green NGOs in Africa more →

      • Protecting snow leopards
        NABU's rehabilitation facility for injured wildlife in Kyrgyzstan

        NABU's rehab facility for injured wildlife in Kyrgyzstan more →

      • All Topics
      • Climate Change
      • Biodiversity
      • Species
      • Regional Development
      • Ecosystems
      • Traffic
      • Land Use
      • Protected Areas
      • Education
      • Civil Society
      • Cooperations
  • Focus Regions
      • Africa
        Find out where and how NABU is active in Africa

        Find out where and how NABU is active in Africa more →

      • Asia
        NABU implements nature conservation projects in Southeast Asia and Central Asia

        NABU is active in Southeast Asia and Central Asia more →

      • Where we work
      • Europe
      • Africa
      • Asia
      • Caucasus
      • Projects worldwide
      • Germany: Havel
      • Latvia/Finland: Peatlands
      • Ethiopia: Coffee-novation
      • Armenia: Mountains
      • Madagascar: Green coasts
      • Kyrgyzstan: Snow leopard
      • Indonesia: Hutan Harapan
  • EU Policy
      • Make Peatlands Wet Again
        A project to restore and manage peatlands in Poland, Belgium, the Netherlands, Ireland and Germany

        This project restores and manages peatlands in five European countries more →

      • Sustainable Agriculture
        For an eco-friendly agriculture

        For an eco-friendly agriculture in Europe more →

      • Topics
      • Agriculture
      • Ecosystems
      • Traffic
      • Species
      • Education
      • Climate change
      • Issues
      • Common Agricultural Policy
      • NABU Cruise Ranking
      • Offshore wind study
      • Sustainable Finance
  • Get involved
      • Snow leopards
        Support us with your donation or adoption

        Hoping is not enough more →

      • Africa
        Nature conservation and regional development really have an impact – NABU knows this and acts on it.

        Help Africa’s nature by supporting one of our funds more →

      • Topics
      • Civil Society
      • Private Sector Cooperations
      • Environmental Education
      • Donate
      • Snow Leopards
      • Africa
  • Press
  1. Topics
  2. Protected areas
  • Protected Areas
  • AfriBirds
  • Lake Tana
  • Green change
  • Biosphere Reserves
  • Offshore wind study
  • Sheka and Yayu
  • Tajikistan
Read

How can offshore wind expansion become environmentally friendly?

NABU study reveals potential areas, conflicts and solutions

Offshore wind energy is a vital part of the energy transition. By 2045, its capacity is expected to increase ninefold in German waters. But where to place all the wind farms? A NABU study shows how to choose sites that are compatible with nature conservation.

Construction of the Baltic 1 offshore wind farm - photo: NABU/ Andreas Fußer

Construction of the Baltic 1 offshore wind farm - photo: NABU/ Andreas Fußer

Marine spatial planning (MSP) identifies where offshore wind farms can be built. However, in Germany, MSP has largely disregarded the carrying capacity of marine ecosystems. This is contrary to the EU MSP Directive, which mandates that an ecosystem-based approach be applied in MSP. Furthermore, this is contrary to our knowledge that healthy seas, as carbon sinks, are vital allies in the fight against the climate crisis. Instead, MSP in Germany has focused on existing maritime uses and squeezed wind farms into the remaining areas, thereby pitting climate protection against marine conservation.


NABU study prioritises offshore wind areas based on nature conservation criteria

The key to reconciling climate protection and marine conservation lies in:

  • Smart, nature-friendly site selection
  • Thorough environmental assessments to reliably estimate the impacts of development
  • Effective avoidance and mitigation measures to reduce negative effects as much as possible.

A study commissioned by NABU and addressing these issues has now been published (an English summary is available). Its goal is to identify potentially suitable areas for offshore wind energy from a nature conservation perspective within the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ) of the German North and Baltic Seas. It also aims to highlight specific conflicts and propose solutions. The German EEZ was classified using a traffic light system:



Traffic light ranking of the German North and Baltic Seas. Shaded areas represent protected areas, blue and green borders mark planned offshore wind parks.

Traffic light ranking of the German North and Baltic Seas. Shaded areas represent protected areas, blue and green borders mark planned offshore wind parks.

  • Green = areas more environmentally compatible with wind farms, although several sensitive species may still be affected, but no highly sensitive species (the study assigns higher weights to highly sensitive species).
  • Yellow = areas partially environmentally compatible, including highly sensitive species, but impacts are limited and can be mitigated.
  • Red = areas not environmentally compatible, including highly sensitive species, with numerous impacts that cannot be mitigated.

Methodology

For the study, the consultants BioConsult Schuchardt & Scholle and Biota analysed extensive datasets on the distribution of 14 seabird species, harbour porpoises, and the occurrence of five biotope types. The environmental compatibility of offshore areas was then assessed based on the sensitivity of individual species or biotopes to wind farms, in combination with additional ecological site functions, such as breeding areas.

The study differentiates between the construction and operation phases, given their varying impacts and requirement of different mitigation measures. This process initially results in "green" and "non-green" areas. Depending on the number of mitigable and unavoidable impacts, the non-green areas are further categorized as "yellow" or "red" areas. Protected areas with buffer zones are also excluded as unsuitable for wind farms.

Which species and habitat types were considered?

Seabirds:

  • Red-throated and black-throated divers
  • Common guillemot and black guillemot
  • Northern gannet
  • Northern fulmar
  • Common and velvet scoter
  • Long-tailed duck
  • Black-legged kittiwake
  • Little, herring, lesser black-backed, and great black-backed gull

Marine mammals:

  • Harbour porpoise

Protected habitat types:

  • Sandbanks and reefs
  • Sublittoral species-rich coarse sediments
  • Sea-pen and burrowing megafauna communities
  • Aphotic muddy sediment dominated by ocean quahog (Arctica islandica)

Implications of the study

The results indicate that climate protection and marine conservation must be better integrated in offshore wind development by excluding critical areas for nature. In Germany, the Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency (BSH) is primarily responsible for this task. The BSH develops the German marine spatial plan and spatial development plans, which determine if and when an area might be developed.


The NABU study also analysed impacts of offshore wind farms on the black-legged kittiwake - photo: Frank Derer

The NABU study also analysed impacts of offshore wind farms on the black-legged kittiwake - photo: Frank Derer

According to the study, areas around the “Sylt Outer Reef - Eastern German Bight” Marine Protected Area (MPA) should be kept free from wind energy. During the German MSP negotiations and other regulatory processes NABU has repeatedly called for buffer zones to improve the protection of this MPA, which is particularly sensitive to offshore wind. The new “traffic light” study illustrates not only that such buffer zones are not sufficient, but that the designated wind farms close to the MPA are highly unsuitable. Instead, areas in the south-west stretching from the glacial valley of the river Elbe to the shipping route “SN10” should be prioritised for offshore wind. Here there is potential for replacing those areas from around the Sylt Outer Reef.

In general, the study recommends that spatial allocation in our seas needs to become more adaptive and flexible, rather than maintaining today’s rigid framework. This is a task for the next iteration of Germany’s marine spatial plan to address and would require:

  • other user groups (such as shipping) to make space for additional wind areas.
  • joint overlapping use of a particular area by different sectors.
  • swapping areas between different user groups to reduce ecological impacts.

Nevertheless, it appears unlikely that all currently foreseen uses as well as the targeted 70 GW offshore wind capacity can be installed at sea in a manner that is environmentally sustainable. It is evident that higher spatial efficiency is needed. The energy generated per unit area must increase to ensure that sufficient space for protected species and habitats is available. The government urgently needs to establish an adequate legislative framework, while industry must enhance spatial efficiency through technical innovation.


NABU calls for:

  • Excluding red areas from offshore wind development given the conflict with nature conservation.
  • Rigorously applying ecological criteria during the development of the next marine spatial plan and other processes of spatial allocation at sea, as demonstrated by the NABU study.
  • The offshore industry should actively pursue technical innovations to extract more power from already allocated areas, thereby reducing the need for additional space for energy generation.
  • Green areas are not a carte blanche for development; species and habitats are also negatively affected here, and interventions must be carefully assessed and offset.

Downloads

0.3 MB - NABU study: English summary
6.2 MB - NABU study (German language)
0.8 MB - Handout: Offshore location ranking (German language)
 

RELATED TOPICS

Pipe delivery for the Nord Stream 2 pipeline in October 2016 in Mukran on the island of Rügen. Photo: Nord Stream 2 / Axel Schmidt
Pipeline passing marine protected areas?

The ecology of the Baltic Sea is in bad shape, as typical habitats are under threat or have already completely disappeared. According to the current plans, Nord Stream 2 will pass through five protected areas, despite there being no urgent need for an increased gas supply. more →

Cruise ship in a Norwegian fjord - photo: Angelica Lambertin
NABU Cruise Ranking 2023

Rising greenhouse gas emissions and heavy air pollutions remain the gravest problems of the cruise ship industry. NABU's annual cruise ship ranking, presented on 28 June in Hamburg, delivers renewed evidence that change is needed. But hope is on the horizon. more →

Baltic SeaLIFE Key Visual
Baltic SeaLIFE: Discover. Understand. Protect.

The Baltic Sea is a very special marine environment – a fascinating world that features both fresh and saltwater systems. Join us for a virtual dive to the mysterious underwater world and experience its diversity and fragility. more →

CONTACT

Kim Detloff - photo: NABU/Philip Scholl
Dr. Kim Cornelius Detloff
Head of Team Marine Protection Programme Kim.Detloff@NABU.de +49 030 284 98 1626

Where we work

  • Europe
  • Africa
  • Asia
  • Caucasus
Where we work: Europe, Africa, Asia, Caucasus
Where we work: Europe, Africa, Asia, Caucasus Where we work

NABU on Social Media

Address & Contact

NABU
Charitéstraße 3
10117 Berlin

Phone 030.28 49 84-0 | Fax - 20 00
NABU@NABU.de

Donations for nature

SozialBank
IBAN: DE65370205000008051805

Donate online

Information & Service

  • Contacts
  • Press
  • Jobs
  • Shop
  • Imprint
  • Data Protection
  • Cookie Settings
  • Transparency
  • Safeguards

Main Topics

  • Biodiversity
  • Climate
  • Regional Development
  • Ecosystems
  • Protected Areas
  • Land Use
  • Civil Society

Donations for nature

SozialBank
IBAN: DE65370205000008051805

  • Contacts
  • Press
  • Shop

Ja, ich möchte mehr über die Naturschutzarbeit des NABU erfahren.

Der individualisierte und an Ihren Interessen ausgerichtete Newsletter ist jederzeit abbestellbar. Mehr Informationen dazu finden Sie in unseren Hinweisen zum Datenschutz.

  • Deutsche Version